*MACE-Dir Conference Call* June 9, 2003 *Participants* Keith Hazelton -- Wisconsin (chair) David Bantz -- Alaska Brendan Bellina -- Notre Dame Steven Carmody -- Brown Renee Frost -- Michigan/Internet2 Ken Klingenstein -- Colorado/Internet2 Bob Morgan -- Washington Todd Piket -- Michigan Tech Art Vandenburg -- Georgia State Nate Klingenstein -- Internet2 (scribe) *Discussion* International eduPerson While eduPerson has had widespread domestic interest, there has also been considerable uptake of eduPerson by the international community. However, since eduPerson was not primarily designed to be an international object class, there are some issues: for example, all attributes and some values such as faculty and staff have America-centric names, and other difficulties persist. There is now considerable interest in the multinational community in moving beyond this to a broader person object class that could be used for international collaboration. Internet2 is willing to host a series of calls to discuss this new project as often as weekly; European collaboration will be present, especially through the conduit of Ingrid Melve of UNINETT. [AI] Keith took an initial action item of getting pointers to various directory persons from various countries to begin putting together this effort. The question would remain about what would happen to the existing eduPerson. Many people saw eduPerson remaining as it is. There is also a natural place here for an LDAP object class repository such as the project undertaken by Peter Gietz of DAASI International GmbH. Process Keith suggested that the easiest way to move forward on a difficult project like this is to begin by aggregating a bunch of interested parties from as many nations as possible and trying to agree on a list of "interesting" attributes. Presuming this activity is successful and yields a sufficient list, the group could then move on to discussion of common syntax and semantics. From there, there could be efforts on deciding which object classes these attributes should live in. Another tough question is the proper scope for these object classes. Ton Verschuren of SURFnet has suggested that object classes probably exist at three levels: global object classes which can be deployed anywhere and contain the most general attributes, local object classes which support activities specific to the community the directory serves, and some level of aggregation or federation in between those extremes. It's not immediately obvious what level of aggregation would be appropriate for what this group produces. *Action Item* [AI] Keith will post a message to the list with pointers to various directory persons developed by various international organizations.